Advisor
Wiki Standards, Frameworks & Models Security Frameworks OWASP MASVS (Mobile)

OWASP MASVS (Mobile)

3 min read
Jump to:

Overview

The OWASP Mobile Application Security Verification Standard (MASVS) is a framework designed to provide a baseline for mobile app security requirements. It helps organizations systematically identify and mitigate security risks in mobile applications across development and deployment phases.

Primary Objectives

  • Enable consistent security assurance for mobile applications through standardized verification requirements
  • Benefit security engineers, developers, auditors, and risk managers by providing clear security goals and controls
  • Support informed decision-making and accountability by defining measurable security criteria and verification processes

Scope & Applicability

  • Applicable to organizations developing or managing mobile applications across industries such as finance, healthcare, and retail, regardless of size
  • Covers mobile app security domains including architecture, data storage, cryptography, authentication, network communication, and code quality; excludes broader mobile device security and backend infrastructure
  • Requires foundational governance such as asset inventory of mobile applications and classification of sensitive data handled by the apps

Core Structure

  • Composed of security verification requirements grouped into categories such as Architecture, Data Storage, Cryptography, Authentication, Network Communication, and Code Quality
  • Organized hierarchically from security principles to detailed requirements and verification tests, facilitating systematic assessment
  • Uses control identifiers and categories to map requirements, enabling traceability and integration with other security frameworks

How It Is Used

  • Adopted through baseline implementation for new mobile apps or phased rollout for existing portfolios, often starting with pilot projects
  • Supports assessment workflows including gap analysis, security audits, and formal attestations to verify compliance with defined controls
  • Integrated into engineering workflows such as secure design reviews, software development lifecycle (SDLC) security gates, and backlog prioritization for remediation

Implementation Artifacts

  • Derives security policies, standards, and procedures tailored to mobile app security requirements
  • Includes a control library with mappings to other standards like NIST SP 800-53 and ISO/IEC 27001 for broader compliance alignment
  • Generates evidence packages comprising audit tickets, configuration files, logs, and screenshots to demonstrate control implementation and testing

Measurement & Maturity

  • Utilizes key performance indicators such as control coverage percentages and frequency of security testing to measure effectiveness
  • Employs maturity levels to assess capability progression from basic compliance to advanced security posture
  • Defines common baselines distinguishing minimum viable security controls from more comprehensive, risk-based implementations

Common Pitfalls

  • Focusing solely on checklist completion without aligning controls to actual mobile app risk profiles
  • Overextending scope leading to unnecessary complexity or under-scoping that misses critical security aspects
  • Leaving controls without clear ownership, providing insufficient evidence, or maintaining outdated documentation

Integration & Mapping

  • Provides crosswalks to frameworks such as OWASP ASVS, NIST, and ISO standards to facilitate integrated security management
  • Integrates with governance, risk, and compliance (GRC) systems, security operations centers (SOC), incident response (IR), and SDLC processes
  • Supports tooling integration including GRC platforms and automated control testing tools to streamline verification and reporting

When Not to Use It

  • May be unsuitable for organizations seeking lightweight or minimal mobile security guidelines due to its comprehensive nature
  • Less appropriate when regulatory requirements focus primarily on backend or network security rather than mobile app specifics
  • In such cases, alternative staged approaches or focused mobile security checklists may be more practical

Standards & References

  • Official OWASP MASVS documentation and verification guides published by the OWASP Foundation
  • Companion materials including implementation guides, control mappings, and testing checklists available through OWASP resources
Tags: Application Security Compliance MASVS Mobile Application mobile security OWASP Risk Management Security Controls Security Framework Security Standards